LETTER TO
THE EDITOR:
CONSIDER
ALTERNATIVES TO GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION
Minister
of Water, Land and Natural Resources Dr. Xavier Jayakumar’s proposal to tap
into Malaysia’s groundwater supply to meet growing water demand is baffling,
considering that there are many other less costly and destructive means of
meeting our country’s water needs.
That the
Minister reported of forests in Kedah catching fire due to drought is precisely
what environmentalists and concerned citizens have been warning the authorities
about for years – protect water catchment areas, gazette the Ulu Muda Forest
Complex, and end deforestation, or we will face a water crisis.
A fully-grown
tree releases 1,000 litres of water vapour a day into the atmosphere. Thus
logging leads to higher temperatures and a decline in rainfall due to the
reduced ability of a cleared or decimated forest to absorb solar energy and
release water vapour.
The
2016 drought affecting the northern states of Peninsular Malaysia is directly
linked to logging activities in the Ulu Muda forest complex, which affected
climate and water cycle patterns, resulting in a massive decline in dam water
levels and a postponement of the paddy planting season.
Now that
a water crisis is imminent, the Minister has made the alarming proposal to
drain other sources of water, rather than manage the resource that best ensures
a sustainable and consistent supply of water – our tropical rainforests, which
act as vital water catchment zones.
It is essential
that we protect our remaining forests and maintain the health of our rivers,
wetlands and water catchment areas to ensure that water resources are safe for
us and can be sustained for future generations.
Tapping
into our groundwater supply while failing to protect water catchment areas,
manage water demand, and end non-revenue water loss, is like withdrawing funds
from an already overdrawn bank account.
The
sustained pumping of groundwater can lead to groundwater depletion and
deterioration of water quality. As water levels in lakes and rivers are also
linked to groundwater seepage, the excessive drawing of groundwater can result
in a decline in the water levels of lakes and rivers and the loss of riparian
vegetation and wildlife habitats.
When
groundwater is continually pumped out of the earth, it can result in land
subsidence, namely, the collapse and sinking of soil. This can result in
disasters such as the opening up of sinkholes and surface cavities such as in
New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, the tilting and cracking of buildings such
as in Mexico City, and severe flooding such as in Bangkok. Studies have shown
that land subsidence can continue for decades even after groundwater pumping
has been stopped, as was observed in Arizona.
The
Minister should instead seriously consider water conservation measures while
options are still available to us, before our water supply has dropped to
crisis levels.
We
can learn from the example of the State of California, which faced a drought
and water crisis in 2015. In April 2015, California Governor
Jerry Brown ordered a 25% reduction in urban water use. Amazingly, within
one month of the water reduction law being implemented, California's water
usage went down by not merely 25% but 29%.
Their
water conservation measures included emergency adoption of building codes to
conserve water, rebates for water-saving devices and landscape conversion and
irrigation, water-efficient landscaping, imposing a fine for water wastage,
local outdoor watering restrictions, statewide regulations requiring businesses
to serve water to customers and launder linens and towels only when
specifically requested, and hefty penalties for farmers who pump water from
drought-stricken rivers. In a world where clean water is becoming increasingly
scarce, it is important that we adopt the best and most cost-effective water
conservation practices from around the world such as those implemented by the
State of California.
The solution to
our country's water problems lies not in tapping into underground water
reserves, the construction of an infinite number of dams, or in water rationing
for domestic users, but in protecting vital watershed areas, repairing and
maintaining the existing water supply infrastructure to minimise non-revenue
water loss, and to promote and enforce more efficient water use.
By
the Minister’s own admission, non-revenue water loss in Malaysia is calculated
to be at the rate of 5,929 million litres per day of treated water, which is
sufficient to meet the water demand in both Selangor (3,316 million litres a
day) and Johor (1,320 million litres a day). Surely the priority of the
Minister should be replace leaky and damaged water infrastructure and end water
theft, rather than to extract water from an ever-increasing number of natural
sources?
As for
the argument that watershed conservation, water-saving measures, and the
replacement of old pipes and water supply systems to plug non-revenue water
loss will burden the rakyat, it is submitted that constructing yet more dams
and groundwater extraction infrastructure will cost taxpayers even more. Given
the choice between paying for a temporary solution to water shortage issues
(i.e. dams and groundwater wells that will result in environmental destruction or
will eventually dry up) and a more durable solution to protect water security
(i.e. protection of watersheds, replacement of unsafe and leaking water supply
pipes with safer and sturdier pipes, tiered pricing system to penalise only
water wastage and heavy water use), I believe most taxpayers and consumers
would make the rational decision to spend their money on the latter.
A
responsible government is one that makes decisions that will protect the
safety, health, and food and water security of its citizens, and environmental
and ecological integrity for generations to come, regardless of who will hold
political power then.
WONG EE
LYNN
PETALING
JAYA, SELANGOR
No comments:
Post a Comment